In this topic will be published the results, as well as all that relates in one way or another to the behavior of the Outcomes of this competition. Firstly, I would like to thank the members of the Jury for their work and the efforts that have been made. Secondly, we notify the Participants that we have slightly adjusted the prize fund of this competition: All Players who submitted photos and participated in the Contest will receive 100 points to their Account. The winners of the nominations will receive 350 points each. Second Vice-Mister - 600 pt. First Vice-Mister - 850 pt. The winner can choose between immortal chorus and 1,350 nm (a pet can be read here ). On the voting process. Expand ) Spoiler : About votingEach member of the Jury received a file with voting rules on his e-mail address. The voting was an individual completion of the result table by each member of the Jury in secret from other members of the Jury. The table was a list of participants (the leftmost column going down) and a list of nominations (in the table of contents of each column on the right). In each column the member of the Jury was to place: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 points. We withdrew such points as '9' and '11' to give the Leaders in the nomination a slight advantage over the others. If the quality was allocated, then it should be allocated as a result. All points for the column are unique. You could not put twice one of these points (for example: twice 10 points in one column). The greatest score - 12 gets the most liked and most suitable for the nominated participant. However, by 12 points there was a more stringent restriction: one Participant could only get 12 points from one member of the Jury. For example, if you put 12 points in one nomination, then put the same 12 points in another nomination THE SAME JOURNEY could not any more. In the file sent to each member of the Jury, there were also descriptions of nominations. The description was a general recommendation and that characteristic of the nomination that we put in, highlighting this or that quality for the nomination. They had to rely on their tastes, ALL photos (except for a photo with a monitor), sent by the Participant, and a story about themselves. Thus, in case of an elementary calculation, in case of the best outcome, one Participant could score a maximum of 108 points (9 members of the Jury theoretically gave all their 12 points unanimously to one Participant in one particular nomination). In practice, such unanimity was not, except for one nomination. At the same time, please take into account that the voting was free, independent and secret. In this regard, We can not explain this or that choice of members of our Jury. And we will not disclose, even anonymously, effective voting tables. However, with the publication of the results and the nomination of nominations, I will indicate how many points the Participant received in this nomination after summing up the results of all Jury members. Thus, you will be able to determine how unanimously the Jury was in one or another nomination. So, let's proceed to a gradual and systematic announcement of the results.